Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
961-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

961-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029286 50.867432)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029229 50.867426,-1.029232 50.867437,-1.029240 50.867447,-1.029252 50.867456,-1.029268 50.867461,-1.029285 50.867463,-1.029303 50.867461,-1.029319 50.867456,-1.029331 50.867448,-1.029340 50.867438,-1.029343 50.867427,-1.029340 50.867416,-1.029332 50.867406,-1.029320 50.867398,-1.029304 50.867393,-1.029287 50.867391,-1.029269 50.867392,-1.029253 50.867397,-1.029240 50.867405,-1.029232 50.867415,-1.029229 50.867426)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL